To the extent that Congress passes this bill and it ultimately becomes law, the final bill and subsequent regulations will need to clarify the following in order to ensure consistent application and compliance: The Act also permits an agency to waive the prohibition on contract awards and renewals and on the contract termination requirement if the head of an agency certifies that the waiver “is for the national security of the United States or in the public interest of the United States, and includes in such certification a justification for the waiver and description of the contract to which the waiver applies.” Notably, this certification cannot be delegated to a contracting officer, and it must be submitted to the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and to the House Committee on Oversight and Reform.Īs to the specifics, the Act raises more questions than answers, and it defers clarity to a subsequent promulgation of rules to be issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) at a later date. The Act also would not apply to companies that have suspended or terminated business operations in Russia. The Act exempts and does not require the termination of contracts that benefit Ukraine or contracts for humanitarian purposes to meet basic human needs. In general, termination proceedings must be initiated within 60 days after passage of the legislation but such proceedings may be extended for an additional 30 or 60 days by an agency head upon a contractor’s provision of a plan to demonstrate compliance with the Act and a good faith and satisfactory effort to comply with the Act and the plan. The Act does not specify whether such termination would be for the government’s convenience – which would allow contractors to be paid for work performed up through the date of termination – or whether the termination would be for default. Second, the Act, as currently drafted, directs federal agencies to “initiate termination proceedings” on all covered contracts with companies still doing business in Russia. The prohibition will also apply to subcontractors. Based on the Act’s definition of “covered contract,” the prohibition on conducting business operations in Russia appears to apply beyond just the contracting company, and also applies to any parent, subsidiary, successor entity, or beneficial owner of such company. The Act excludes, however, business operations that benefit Ukraine, provide humanitarian assistance, provide legal assistance for compliance with laws other than Russia, and journalism. The Act defines the term “business operations” in Russia broadly to mean “engaging in commerce in any form, including acquiring, developing, selling, leasing, or operating equipment, facilities, personnel, products, services, personal property, real property, or any other apparatus of business or commerce” (emphasis added). The purpose of the Act is to prevent the United States from “conduct business with companies that undermine United States national security interests and international law by continuing to operate in the Russian Federation during its ongoing war of aggression against Ukraine.” The Act takes a bold and broad-sweeping stance to prohibit federal agencies from entering into new contracts, as well as requiring the termination of existing contracts, with any company that is doing business in Russia.įirst, the Act, in its current form, will prohibit agencies from entering into or continuing any “covered contract” with any company that “conduct business operations in territory internationally recognized as the Russian Federation.” Under the Act, the term “covered contract” means “a prime contract entered into by an executive agency and any major subcontract of that contract (as that term is defined by the rulemaking.) with a company (including any parent, subsidiary, successor entity, or beneficial owner of such company) conducting business operations in territory internationally recognized as the Russian Federation during the covered period.” The Act’s prohibitions broadly cover the following: (1) award of new contracts, (2) continued performance on an existing contract, (3) extending the period of performance of an existing contract – such as through the exercise of an option year or modification, or (4) renewing an existing contract through, for example, a bridge contract or procurement award.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |